Connect with us

Regulation

FBI seizes $100K in NFTs from scammer following ZachXBT investigation

Published

on

FBI seizes $100K in NFTs from scammer following ZachXBT investigation


The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has seized two non-fungible tokens (NFTs) worth more than $100,000 and 86.5 Ether (ETH) from a reported phishing scammer.

The alleged scammer in question, Chase Senecal — known as Horror (HZ) online — was initially exposed via a lengthy investigation by independent blockchain sleuth ZachXBT posted back in September.

In the FBI’s official notification posted on Feb. 3, it outlined that Seneca’s property — which also included an Audemars Piguet (AP) Royal Oak Watch worth $41,000 — was “seized for federal forfeiture for violation of federal law.”

The FBI’s notification did not detail much other information on the ordeal apart from noting that all of the property was seized on Oct. 24. The specific NFTs include Bored Ape Yacht Club#9658, and Doodle #3114 and were valued at $95,495 and $9,361 at the time of seizure.

The 86.5 ETH was valued at $116,433 at the time of seizure, but is now worth $144,000 at the time of writing.

It is unclear what the full scope of legal proceedings that have taken place against Senecal are at this stage. However, according to the FBI’s law enforcement bulletin, federal forfeiture is a law enforcement tool that enables the government to “remove—without compensation for the individual—ownership of property involved in a crime.”

“It may occur in a civil procedure, like a lawsuit against the item, or after the conviction of an individual in a criminal trial,” the FBI states.

While the FBI has not come out with an official tip of the hat to ZachXBT, the on-chain sleuth noted via Twitter on Feb. 3 that the property seizure did “come as a result” of his investigation.

“I look forward to hopefully seeing more phishing scammers suffer a similar fate in the future for harming so many people in this space,” ZachXBT wrote.

With the seizure of a Bored Ape NFT, people in the community have joked that the FBI will change its profile picture to Ape #9658.

Photoshopped FBI profile pic: @CryptoWithNick on Twitter

Notably, the flashy AP watch was one of the key identifiers that helped ZachXBT unmask Senecal’s identity and on-chain activity during the investigation.

Related: Logan Paul and CryptoZoo hit with lawsuit as investors take action

In a medium post from Sept. 2, ZachXBT explained that after seeing Horroz (HZ) brag about the new watch on social media, he asked “around a few mutual friends who sell watches” and eventually managed to get in contact with the person who sold that specific AP watch to Senecal.

Unfortunately for Senecal, the payment was said to have been made on the blockchain via the use of USD Coin (USDC).

“The address HZ used to pay the watch seller $47.5k was DIRECTLY funded by multiple addresses used to scam people with hacked Twitter accounts such as @deekaymotion, @Zeneca_33, @ezu_xyz, [and] @JRNYclub,” ZachXBT wrote.

This is not the first time ZachXBT’s research has played a key role in helping government authorities. In October, France’s national cyber unit cited ZachXBT’s work in helping it catch and charge a group of alleged fraudsters on suspicion of stealing $2.5 million worth of NFTs via phishing scams.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Regulation

Senate Banking Committee Holds Hearing on Recent Bank Collapses, Calls for Tougher Regulations – Regulation Bitcoin News

Published

on


On Tuesday, the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, also known as the Senate Banking Committee, held a hearing to discuss the recent bank collapses in the United States and the regulatory response. Throughout the testimonies, digital assets and crypto businesses were mentioned. Senate Banking Committee chairman Sherrod Brown claimed on Tuesday that Signature Bank “found itself in the middle of Sam Bankman-Fried’s crime spree at the crypto exchange FTX.”

Regulators Highlight Bank Exposure to Crypto Asset Businesses in Senate Banking Committee Hearing About Bank Failures

Following the collapse of Silvergate Bank, Silicon Valley Bank, and Signature Bank, the Senate Banking Committee held a hearing to discuss the situation and its implications. The hearing witnesses included Martin Gruenberg, chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC); Michael Barr, vice chairman for supervision with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve; and Nellie Liang, the Treasury’s domestic finance undersecretary, in addition to committee chairman Sherrod Brown and ranking member Tim Scott.

“Right now, none of the executives who ran these banks into the ground are barred from taking other banking jobs, none have had their compensation clawed back, none have paid any fines,” explained Brown. “Some executives have decamped to Hawaii. Others have already gone on to work for other banks. Some simply wandered off into the sunset.” The chairman of the Senate Banking Committee revealed that he is preparing legislation that will enhance regulators’ capacity to enforce fines and penalties, reclaim bonuses, and prohibit executives who are responsible for bank failures from ever working at another bank again.

The FDIC chairman, Gruenberg, discussed the exposure to cryptocurrency businesses in connection to the bank failures. Gruenberg talked about how Silvergate Bank stated that it held “$11.9 billion in digital asset-related deposits” and had “less than 10 percent of total deposits” exposed to FTX. The chairman also mentioned the crypto asset clientele of Signature Bank, as well as the digital currency settlement systems of both Silvergate and Signature. Gruenberg noted that these banks held long Treasuries and were unprepared for the interest rate increases that followed the Covid-19 pandemic.

“A common thread between the collapse of Silvergate Bank and the failure of SVB was the accumulation of losses in the banks’ securities portfolios,” Gruenberg said.

The chairman of the FDIC stated that the situations involving both Signature Bank and Silicon Valley Bank “warrant further extensive examination by both regulators and policymakers.” Michael Barr of the Federal Reserve added that SVB’s downfall was caused by its management’s inability to cope with interest rate adjustments and a bank run. “SVB failed because the bank’s management did not effectively manage its interest rate and liquidity risk, and the bank then suffered a devastating and unexpected run by its uninsured depositors in a period of less than 24 hours,” Barr emphasized.

Barr stressed the importance of developing the current comprehension of banking “in light of evolving technologies and emerging risks.” He stated that the Federal Reserve was “analyzing” recent incidents and variables such as “customer behavior, social media, concentrated and novel business models, rapid growth, deposit runs, interest rate risk, and other factors.” The U.S. central bank representative added that, with all of these new and emerging variables, regulators must reconsider how they supervise and regulate financial institutions in the United States. “And for how we think about financial stability,” Barr concluded.

Tags in this story

bank executives, bank failures, Banking technology, bonuses, concentrated business models, COVID-19, crypto businesses, customer behavior, deposit runs, Digital Assets, Exposure, FDIC, Federal Reserve, Financial Crisis, Financial Institutions, Financial Regulation, financial stability, fines, Hawaii, interest rate increases, interest rate risk, Legislation, liquidity risk, Martin Gruenberg, Michael Barr, Nellie Liang, novel business models, pandemic, penalties, rapid growth, regulatory oversight, regulatory response, securities portfolios, senate banking committee, Sherrod Brown, Signature Bank, Silicon Valley Bank, Silvergate Bank, Social Media, supervising financial institutions, Tim Scott, Treasury, uninsured depositors

What do you think about the Senate Banking Committee hearing about the bank failures? Share your thoughts about this subject in the comments section below.

Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman is the News Lead at Bitcoin.com News and a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open-source code, and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 6,000 articles for Bitcoin.com News about the disruptive protocols emerging today.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

More Popular News

In Case You Missed It



Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

Binance CEO CZ rejects allegations of market manipulation

Published

on



Binance CEO Changpeng ‘CZ’ Zhao has rejected allegations from the Commodities Futures and Trading Commission complaint, arguing the company “does not trade for profit or ‘manipulate’ the market under any circumstances.”

The chief executive shared his first official response to the lawsuit in a March 28 blog post.

The CEO argued that while Binance “trades” in a number of situations, this is mainly to convert them “from time-to-time” to cover expenses in fiat or other cryptocurrencies, as its revenues are in crypto.

“Personally, I have two accounts at Binance: one for Binance Card, one for my crypto holdings. I eat our own dog food and store my crypto on Binance.com. I also need to convert crypto from time to time to pay for my personal expenses or for the Card.”

Zhao also noted that Binance has a 90 day no-day-trading rule for employees, adding: 

“This is to prevent any employees from actively trading. We also prohibit our employees from trading in Futures.”

He went further to state that employees are restricted from buying or selling coins where they’ve obtained “private information” about them.

“I observe these policies myself strictly. I also never participated in Binance Launchpad, Earn, Margin, or Futures. I know the best use of my time is to build a solid platform that services our users,” he add

Zhao called the recent CFTC filing both “unexpected and disappointing,” as it had been working cooperatively with the regulator for over two years. He also noted that the complaint “appears to contain an incomplete recitation of facts.”

Regarding the compliance allegations, CZ says Binance.com has developed “best-in-class” technology to ensure compliance and currently has more than 750 people working to ensure their business operates within the bounds of anti-money laundering (AML) and know your client (KYC) laws:

“To date, we have handled 55,000+ LE requests, and assisted US LE freeze/seize more than $125 million in funds in 2022 alone and $160 million in 2023 so far.”

Related: CFTC calls ETH a commodity in Binance suit, highlighting the complexity of classification

CZ also pointed out that Binance.com holds 16 licenses to offer digital asset trading services, the most of any cryptocurrency trading platform.

This is a developing story, and further information will be added as it becomes available.



Source link

Continue Reading

Regulation

80 Crypto Firms Interested in Establishing Presence in Hong Kong, Official Says – Regulation Bitcoin News

Published

on

80 Crypto Firms Interested in Establishing Presence in Hong Kong, Official Says


Hong Kong’s Secretary for Financial Services and Treasury has revealed that more than 80 crypto companies have expressed interest in establishing a presence in Hong Kong. They include companies across mainland China, Canada, European Union countries, Singapore, the U.K., and the U.S. “We attach great importance to virtual asset (VA) and Web3,” said the government official.

80 Crypto Companies Interested in Hong Kong

Hong Kong Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Christopher Hui revealed during a speech at the Aspen Digital Web 3 Investment Summit earlier this week that more than 80 crypto firms have expressed interest in establishing a presence in Hong Kong.

“We attach great importance to virtual asset (VA) and Web3,” Hui stated, emphasizing: “The Government has high-level commitment of developing the sector and providing a comprehensive support system to enterprises which are passionate pioneers and start-ups in this area.”

The official noted that the “Policy Statement on Development of VA,” which the Hong Kong government issued last year, “has been well received by the industry,” elaborating:

As of end-February 2023, Invest Hong Kong has received expressions of interest from over 80 virtual asset-related mainland and foreign companies in establishing their presence in Hong Kong.

Invest Hong Kong (Invest HK) is a government department with a mission to attract and retain foreign direct investment (FDI) to Hong Kong.

“These companies included VA exchanges, blockchain infrastructure companies, blockchain network security companies, virtual currency wallets and payment companies, as well as other projects on building the Web3 ecosystem,” Hui detailed.

Specifically, as of the end of February, Invest Hong Kong has received indications from 23 companies across mainland China, Canada, European Union countries, Singapore, the U.K., and the U.S. that they plan to establish a presence in Hong Kong, the official said.

Hui also mentioned that the Hong Kong government has established a licensing regime for crypto service providers which will go into effect in June, and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority is developing a regulatory regime for stablecoins with the goal of implementing regulations by 2024.

“We have advanced our securities rules to allow regulated intermediaries to offer trading of eligible VA futures ETFs [exchange-traded funds] to retail investors in Hong Kong,” the official further shared, noting:

Within a few months’ time, we are glad to see that three VA futures ETFs have already been listed and traded on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

“Hong Kong is well-positioned to be a leading hub for Web3 in Asia and beyond,” Hui claimed, adding: “We have a vibrant fintech ecosystem here in Hong Kong, with over 800 fintech companies offering different kinds of innovative and convenient financial services for members of the public and the business sector.”

Do you think Hong Kong will become a crypto hub? Let us know in the comments section below.

Kevin Helms

A student of Austrian Economics, Kevin found Bitcoin in 2011 and has been an evangelist ever since. His interests lie in Bitcoin security, open-source systems, network effects and the intersection between economics and cryptography.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

More Popular News

In Case You Missed It



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com